This is an early and alpha release of Docusaurus 2. We are making it available early to maximize community participation and feedback. Expect it to evolve a lot over the course of the alpha-beta period. If you are adventurous enough to be an early adopter, chat with us on Discord 😉.
You should use this if
- ✅ You want to contribute to Docusaurus 2
- ✅ You want to provide feedback to make sure it suits your needs
- ✅ You are curious about what's next as a Docusaurus user
Do not use this if
- ❌ You need a full production-ready solution (try Docusaurus 1 instead)
- ❌ You need the translation features present in v1
- ❌ You prefer not to work with potential breaking changes and/or features not yet working properly as we improve it during alpha period
A better Docusaurus is coming to town
Docusaurus 1 used to be a pure documentation site generator. In Docusaurus 2, we rebuilt it from the ground up, allowing for more customizability but preserved the best parts of Docusaurus 1 - easy to get started, versioned docs, and i18n (coming soon).
Beyond that, Docusaurus 2 is a performant static site generator and can be used to create most content-driven websites (e.g. Documentation, Blogs, Product Landing and Marketing Pages, etc) extremely fast.
While our main focus will still be helping you get your documentations right and well, the shared nature of building this static site generator makes it possible for you to build your whole website interface one-stop.
Docusaurus is built with high attention to your experience building your site and maintaining it with your collaborators and contributors.
- ⚛️ Built with 💚 and React
- Extend and customize with React
- Gain full control of your site's browsing experience by
swizzlingin your own components
- 🔌 Pluggable
- Bootstrap your site with a basic template, then pick and plug functionalities built by us and our community.
- Open source your plugins to share with your fellow documentarians, because sharing is caring.
- ✂️ Developer experience
- Multiple bootstrapping templates to get your site up and running, start writing your docs right now
- Universal configuration entry point to make it more maintainable by contributors
- Hot reloading with lightning fast incremental build on changes
- Route-based code and data splitting
- Publish to GitHub Pages, Netlify, and other deployment services with ease
Our shared goal — to help your users find what they need fast, and understand your products better. With the experience of Docusaurus 1, we share with you our best practices to help you build your doc site right and well.
- 🎯 SEO friendly
- HTML files are statically generated for every possible path
- page-specific SEO to help your users land on your official docs directly relating their problems at hand
- 📝 Powered by MDX
- Write interactive components via JSX and React embedded in markdown
- Share your code in live editors to get your users love your products on the spot
- 🔍 Search Your full site is searchable
- 🌍 i18n (coming soon)
- 💾 Document Versioning Helps you keep documentation in sync with project releases.
Docusaurus 2 is born to be compassionately accessible to all your users, and lightning fast.
- ⚡️ Lightning fast Docusaurus 2 follows The PRPL Pattern that makes sure your content loads blazing fast
- 🦖 Accessible Attention to accessibility, making your site equally accessible to all users
Comparison with other tools
Across all static site generators, Docusaurus has a unique focus on doc sites and has out-of-the-box structure you need.
We've also studied other main static site generators and would like to share our insights on the comparison, hopefully to help you navigate through the prismatic choices out there.
Gatsby is packed with a lot of features, has a rich ecosystem of plugins and is capable of doing everything that Docusaurus does. Naturally, that comes at a cost of a higher learning curve. Gatsby does many things well and is suitable for building many types of websites. On the other hand, Docusaurus tries to do one thing super well - be the best tool for writing and publishing content.
GraphQL is also pretty core to Gatsby, although you don't necessarily need GraphQL to build a Gatsby site. In most cases when building static websites, you won't need the flexibility that GraphQL provides.
Many aspects of Docusaurus 2 were inspired by the best things about Gatsby and it's a great alternative.
Gitbook has very clean slate design and has been used by many open source projects. With its focus shifting towards a commercial product rather than an open-source tool, many of its requirements no longer fit the needs as an open source project's doc site. As a result, many have to turn to other products. You may read about Redux's switch to Docusaurus here.
Currently, Gitbook is only free for open-source and non-profit teams. Docusaurus is free for everyone.
Jekyll is one of the most mature static site generators around and has been a great tool to use — in fact, before Docusaurus, most of Facebook's Open Source websites are/were built on Jekyll! It is extremely simple to get started. We want to bring a similar developer experience as building a static site with Jekyll.
In comparison with statically generated HTML and interactivity based on
<script /> tags, Docusaurus sites are React apps. With tooling of our current ecosystem, we hope to set new standards on doc sites performance, asset build pipeline and optimizations, and ease to setup.
VuePress has many similarities with Docusaurus - both focus heavily on content-centric website and provides tailored documentation features out of the box. However, VuePress is powered by Vue, while Docusaurus is powered by React. If you wanted a Vue-based solution, VuePress would be a decent choice.
If you find issues with the documentation or have suggestions on how to improve the documentation or the project in general, please file an issue for us, or send a tweet mentioning the @docusaurus Twitter account.
For new feature requests, you can create a post on our Canny board, which is a handy tool for roadmapping and allows for sorting by upvotes, which gives the core team a better indicator of what features are in high demand, as compared to GitHub issues which are harder to triage. Refrain from making a Pull Request for new features (especially large ones) as someone might already be working on it or will be part of our roadmap. Talk to us first!